this is a fascinating thread...
i want to say thanks to everyone for participating....i really appreciate people's honesty and most people's ability to be candid but respectful
my sexual orientation isnt something i feel entirely comfortable discussing openly on an internet forum, but i'm sure it is inevitable that it will factor in...especially in a discussion like this....so having said that...!
firstly, the reference to the women of 'the L word' as "fantasy lesbians" in one of the previously posted articles is just ridiculous to me.... i understand and probably even participate in the fascination with categories and definitions, but there is only so far they will take you....to market fashion to a 'lesbian community' is as much of an impossibility as it is to market fashion to a 'heterosexual community'.... it depends on the level of accuracy you are aiming for and what exactly you are trying to achieve IMHO...
naturally there is an element of fantasy in the L word, just as there is an element of fantasy, and arguably a large one, in every TV show...it is TELEVISION...not real life....but IMO the mistake comes when people assume the fantasy is introduced because lesbian women in real life do not dress/act/maintain themselves the way the women of The L Word do... as SoftGrey pointed out, this same fact can be thrown at a television show like sex & the city... there are elements of the women on that show, just as on the L word, that are accurate representations of women in real life...but everything must be taken in context...
i understand the desire to market fashion pieces to correct and appropriate audiences.. and that sense of identity that is expressed through fashion can be tightly associated with vanity and sexuality.. but this sexual orientation or interest is only ONE aspect of one's identity.. and certainly not the strongest one, IMO, to employ as a tool to market fashion.....
i dont believe my sexual orientation plays a primary role in my interest in fashion or my personal tastes within fashion... while there are extremes within the minorities of gay and lesbian clientele that will obviously express their sexual orientation in terms of fashion more obviously than those who dont feel influenced by that, there are these same extremes within the heterosexual circle.... and these extremes, in both cases, are a minority----does that mean you do not include them when considering fashion and customer? of course not.... but it is a mistake to insist that these extremes are the way everyone operates....
it is a superficial, and possibly inaccurate, example.... but look at a woman like Portia De Rossi....a lesbian woman in the entertainment world with an awareness of and interest in fashion... feminine... seemingly comfortable with that femininity, whether or not it is equal to or stronger than its masculine counterpart... and then look at a woman like Rosie O'Donnell... who cares none for Chanel couture or where a designer skirt hits her on the leg and how it alters her shape... both lesbian women... both in a business that places a huge stress on image and identity.. both with an extremely different view of fashion and its place in their life....
i dont know what my point is.... but i know that to examine fashion's tie to the lesbian woman is about as vague and overwhelming an endeavour as to examine it's connection to the heterosexual woman... you MUST be more specific... and you have to be careful not to draw lines and create boundaries where they would not naturally form....